UNFINISHEDBUSINESS

Why and How the U.S. Should Establish a Permanent Military Presence on NATO’s Eastern Flank

The security situation on NATO’s Eastern Flank has significantly changed for the worse since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2014 (and arguably before that). An organizing problem: the permanent force posture of the United States and NATO has remained trapped in time—a holdover from the tranquil, idealistic days of the post-Cold War era. In exchange for a promise of constructive behavior by Russia in the 1990s, the Alliance only extended to its Eastern Allies the treaty and political infrastructure of NATO membership. It did not extend the hard security infrastructure that other signatories of the North Atlantic Treaty enjoy—like permanent U.S. forces on their soil if they wished.

 

Since that time, as authors Peter B. Doran and COL (Ret.) Ray Wojcik argue in CEPA's latest Intelligence Brief, "Unfinished Business," the failure to update this force posture has invited aggressive Russian probing of our defenses and new challenges to the rules-based security architecture of Europe. It is now time to update the Alliance’s permanent presence on the Eastern Flank. We can start with Poland—and here’s how.

Peter B. Doran

Ray Wojcik

13 November 2018

  • Black Twitter Icon
  • Black Facebook Icon
Cover.png

Photo: Exercise Allied Spirit IV / U.S. Army

1275 Pennsylvania Ave NW | Suite 400 | Washington, DC 20004 | Phone: 202.551.9200
©2019 by the Center for European Policy Analysis, All Rights Reserved

    • Twitter - Black Circle
    • Facebook - Black Circle
    • YouTube - Black Circle